What are the red flags that Brigit is a loan shark or not?
Let me be very clear. Brigit is not a traditional loan shark. They will not send intimidating men to your door. They will not call your mother at 2 AM. But the company has engaged in practices that regulators consider deceptive.
Let me walk through the red flags that financial regulators have identified.
Red Flag #1: Deceptive Marketing About "Instant" Cash
What the FTC found: Brigit promised "instant" cash advances but did not deliver as advertised .
What this means for you: If a company makes promises it cannot keep, that is a red flag. Before you rely on "instant" cash, test it with a small amount first.
Your decision: Ask other users about their actual experience. How long did the transfer really take?
Red Flag #2: A Mandatory Subscription Fee That Functions as Interest
What the FTC found: Brigit charges a $9.99 monthly membership required to access cash advances. The FTC determined this fee functioned as a finance charge .
What this means for you: The marketing says "no interest." But that $9.99 monthly fee is effectively interest. For a small advance repaid quickly, the APR can exceed 200%.
How to calculate the real APR:
- You pay $9.99 per month
- You borrow $100
- You repay in 7 days
- The $9.99 represents about 10% of what you borrowed
- Over a year, that annualizes to over 500%
Your decision: If you borrow larger amounts ($250) and repay quickly, the fee is a smaller percentage. If you borrow smaller amounts or keep the subscription longer, the effective APR becomes astronomical.
Red Flag #3: Blocking Cancellation Attempts
What the FTC found: Brigit used tactics that prevented customers from cancelling their monthly memberships .
What this means for you: This is a major red flag for any subscription service. If a company makes it hard to cancel, assume they are trying to charge you forever.
Your decision: Before you sign up, find the cancellation button. If it is hidden or requires a phone call during limited hours, reconsider.
Red Flag #4: Subscription Model Can Mask True Borrowing Costs
The broader pattern: Many fintech apps (including Brigit, EarnIn, and others) use subscription fees instead of disclosed interest rates to avoid Truth in Lending Act requirements .
What this means for you: Under federal law, lenders must disclose APRs so consumers can compare costs. When a company calls a charge a "membership fee" instead of interest, it may sidestep those requirements entirely.
Your decision: Ask yourself: Am I paying this fee primarily to borrow money? If yes, that fee is effectively interest regardless of what the company calls it .
Red Flag #5: The True Cost Is Not Immediately Obvious
What the FTC found: The $9.99 monthly fee was not clearly disclosed as a cost of borrowing .
What this means for you: If a company buries costs in the fine print, treat that as a warning sign.
Your decision: Read the entire pricing page before you sign up. If anything is unclear, ask customer support. If they cannot explain it simply, do not sign up.
Red Flag #6: Class Action Pattern in the Fintech Industry
Important context: While there is no verified class action against Brigit specifically, multiple finance apps have faced class actions and federal enforcement for disguising effective APRs inside subscription fees .
Examples: EarnIn faces a class action alleging its optional fees translate to APRs averaging 284% . The pattern is real.
Your decision: Understand that the entire "earned wage access" industry is under regulatory scrutiny. This does not make Brigit illegal, but it does mean you should be cautious.
Related Topics
Explore relevant discussions and continue reading related forum insights.
Featured Loan Apps
Quickly review vetted loan apps related to responsible borrowing decisions.